We’ve entered a new phase of digital transformation—one where traditional financial buyers and strategic acquirers are beginning to move into crypto-native territory.

Private equity firms are acquiring mining companies. Public companies are acquiring blockchain infrastructure startups. Tokenized SaaS platforms and DAO tooling providers are being absorbed by Web2 incumbents looking for a Web3 edge.

But while the headlines focus on valuation and deal size, the real complexity begins post-close.

And nowhere is that complexity more nuanced—or misunderstood—than in transitioning customer and procurement contracts from a crypto-native company into a traditional organization.

Let’s explore why crypto deals break the mold, and what to do differently when it’s time to execute after the deal.

---

The Basics Still Apply—but They’re Not Enough

In any acquisition, integration teams look at:

• Assignment clauses
• Change of control notifications
• Contract renegotiation windows
• Supplier risk and continuity
• Customer relationship preservation

All of those still matter in crypto deals. But the substance beneath those contracts is often fundamentally different.

That’s because in crypto, contracts are often not just legal documents—they’re smart contracts, tokens, wallet interactions, and DAO approvals. (DAO=Decentralized Autonomous Organization).

---

Smart Contracts Are Not Legal Contracts

Smart contracts are pieces of code deployed on a blockchain. They execute business logic—like paying out tokens when a task is completed or automatically issuing rebates to customers.

But here’s the catch: You can’t assign or novate a smart contract the way you would a legal agreement.

• The code is live and immutable.
• It may be tied to a wallet the buyer doesn’t control.
• It may require a new deployment or a governance vote from a DAO.

Translation for M&A teams: You’re not just transitioning documents—you’re transitioning systems of record and autonomous execution layers.

---

Procurement in Crypto Has Its Own Language

For example, in a mining company acquisition, key procurement contracts might include:

• Long-term energy supply agreements
• Hosting contracts for ASICs (Application-Specific Integrated Circuits)
• Hardware purchase agreements from global suppliers
• Maintenance or repair services priced in BTC or stablecoins

Some may have token-denominated pricing, which means volatility needs to be managed as part of post-deal financial planning.

Others may include wallet-linked payment rails where the payment history is visible on-chain—but the vendor’s contact info is nowhere to be found.

---

Customer Contracts May Include Tokenomics

Customer contracts at crypto-native companies are sometimes hybrid:

• A terms of service agreement stored off-chain
• Paired with incentive or rebate systems governed by smart contracts
• Paid out in tokens, not dollars

Transferring these relationships may involve:

• Auditing token reward obligations
• Migrating wallet-linked accounts
• Creating new smart contracts with updated control logic
• Updating “contract ownership” with DAOs or protocol communities

Ask yourself: Who signs off? The legal team, or a DAO governance vote?

---

Wallets Are the New Data Rooms

Control of crypto assets, including token treasuries and contract-linked wallets, adds another layer of post-close diligence:

• Who holds the private keys?
• Are there multisig access controls?
• How will the acquirer take custody?
• Is there a plan for wallet migration or smart contract redeployment?

Failure to plan for this during the transition can delay revenue, break service obligations, or worse—expose assets to theft or error.

---

What to Do: The Transition Playbook

At In2edge, we’ve developed a Crypto Contract Transition Playbook that includes:

1. Digital Asset Mapping – Identify all wallet addresses, smart contracts, and token obligations.
2. Contract Segmentation – Classify legal vs. on-chain vs. hybrid agreements.
3. Assignment & Consent Planning – Trigger change of control clauses and engage counterparties early.
4. Wallet Access Transfer – Secure keys, multisig setups, and update smart contracts where needed.
5. Customer/Vendor Communication – Clarify new terms, payment methods, and continuity expectations.
6. Post-Migration Audits – Reconcile on-chain activity with off-chain documentation and compliance requirements.

Crypto-native firms rarely have a clean handoff process. That’s where execution expertise matters.

---

Looking Ahead: Why This Matters

If your firm is entering the world of crypto deals, the reality is this:

• What you bought is only partly captured in the legal docs.
• The rest lives on-chain, in code, wallets, and communities.
• And transitioning that requires a blend of legal, technical, and operational execution that most integration teams haven’t encountered—yet.

The firms that succeed post-close will be the ones who understand the new terrain—and respect the new rules.

At In2edge, we’re here to help you navigate both.

---

Lisa Scott is CEO of In2edge and host of M&A+ The Art After the Deal, where we explore the realities of integration, execution, and value creation beyond the close.

Imagine a modest home in your neighborhood—a three-bedroom, two-bath ranch with a tidy lawn. In 1990, it cost $100,000. In 2025, it costs $500,000. If you’re paying in dollars, the price just keeps rising. But if you’re paying in Bitcoin, something strange—and powerful—starts to happen: the same house costs less Bitcoin over time.

This is the essence of deflationary money—and it’s one of Bitcoin’s most important, yet least understood, features.

What Does “Deflationary” Mean?

In economics, deflation means an increase in the value of money over time, resulting in lower prices for goods and services.

The U.S. dollar is inflationary—it loses purchasing power over time as more dollars are printed and injected into the economy.

Bitcoin is deflationary by design—it has a fixed supply, and that supply is released on a predictable, declining schedule through events called halvings.

This creates a fundamentally different economic dynamic than what we’re used to with fiat currencies.

Inflation vs Deflation: A Tale of Two Currencies

Let’s revisit that house:

Using U.S. Dollars:

Using Bitcoin (BTC):

What’s happening here?

As Bitcoin becomes scarcer and more widely adopted, its value relative to the dollar increases. As a result, it takes fewer and fewer BTC to buy the same thing—a home, a car, even a share of stock.

Why Is Bitcoin Deflationary?

1. Hard Cap of 21 Million BTC

There will never be more than 21 million Bitcoins. No central bank, government, or company can create more. This is the opposite of the dollar, which has been aggressively expanded since 1971 (when it was removed from the gold standard).

2. Halving Events

Roughly every 4 years, the amount of new Bitcoin entering circulation is cut in half. This is built into the protocol and ensures that supply growth slows over time, until it reaches zero.

• In 2009, 50 BTC were created every 10 minutes.
• In 2024, it’s 3.125 BTC.
• By 2140, new supply stops altogether.

How Does This Help You?

With dollars, you lose value every year to inflation (officially 2–9%, but often more in real life). Your savings buy less, not more.

With Bitcoin:

• You’re holding an asset that grows in purchasing power.
• Bitcoin becomes harder to obtain over time, not easier.
• You are rewarded for saving, not punished.

This aligns with how money used to work—gold-based currencies encouraged thrift and capital preservation. Bitcoin revives that principle, but in a digital, borderless form.

Coinbase’s House Ad: The Visual Metaphor

Coinbase recently aired an ad showing a house being purchased over time:

• In dollars, the cost increases dramatically—every decade, you need more bills to buy the same home.
• In Bitcoin, the amount needed shrinks over time.

It’s a simple, but profound message:

• Bitcoin flips the script.
• Instead of the world getting more expensive, your money gets more powerful.

What Are the Risks?

Bitcoin isn’t magic. Its deflationary nature is dependent on adoption, technology, and network security. Here are a few caveats:

• Price volatility: Bitcoin can be volatile in the short term, even as it’s deflationary long-term.
• Regulatory uncertainty: Government action can impact access and use.
• Security responsibility: You must protect your Bitcoin keys—there’s no central authority to call if you lose them.

But over 15 years, Bitcoin has never been hacked, has weathered legal and market storms, and continues to grow in adoption and utility.

The Bottom Line: Bitcoin Buys More, Not Less

In a world where:

• Eggs cost more each year,
• Rent never goes down,
• And your dollar shrinks in value…

Bitcoin offers an alternative—a form of money that rewards the patient, the disciplined, and the informed.

It may not be mainstream yet, but neither was the internet in 1995. And if this new financial system succeeds, one day you’ll tell the story of how your money started buying more, not less—just like Bitcoin told it would.

The 2025 Bitcoin Conference was held at the iconic Venetian in Las Vegas and brought together over 35,000 attendees from around the world — a record-breaking turnout for the event. The atmosphere was a cross between a high-stakes innovation summit and a grassroots financial revolution. Crowds filled massive expo halls, panel stages buzzed with ideas, and the energy was undeniable: Bitcoin isn’t just alive — it’s accelerating. As an attendee, I felt the thrill of witnessing an industry not just finding its footing, but preparing to scale.

A Conference of Highlights and Insights

One highlight was Michael Saylor’s rousing keynote, “21 Ways to Wealth.” Saylor – known for championing Bitcoin – delivered a rapid-fire list of principles for building wealth through Bitcoin.

• He began with “clarity,” arguing that Bitcoin represents “perfected… incorruptible capital” rather than just a speculative asset.
• He preached conviction, predicting Bitcoin will appreciate faster than any other asset and become “the most efficient store of value in human history”.
• Notably, even amidst the high-energy evangelism, Saylor emphasized fundamentals like legal structure and compliance. He reminded entrepreneurs that a “well-structured corporation is the most powerful wealth engine on Earth” and urged builders to “learn the rules of the road” so they can “scale legally and sustainably”.

Hearing this mix of visionary zeal and operational pragmatism resonated with me as both a Bitcoin believer and a business operator. Beyond the big speeches and crowd enthusiasm, I paid close attention to the current ecosystem gaps that could hinder Bitcoin’s broader adoption.

A recurring theme was the challenge of physical security for Bitcoin holdings. Unlike traditional assets, securing crypto requires managing private keys and seed phrases – those 12- or 24-word recovery codes that users must guard with their life. The conference underscored what many in the community admit: today’s self-custody tools are not user-friendly. The average person is one slip-up away from disaster, whether through lost hardware wallets or stolen seed phrases. In fact, even industry experts note that being confronted with a seed phrase on day one is “very difficult” for new users, and the landscape of self-custody remains “perilous” for anyone who isn’t extremely tech-savvy. There’s a palpable need for better solutions in cold storage, key management, and wallet recovery to make holding Bitcoin safer and simpler.

Gaps in the Bitcoin Business Ecosystem

From my operational perspective, the Bitcoin 2025 conference also highlighted several business infrastructure gaps that present both challenges and opportunities:

Security & Custody: As mentioned, securing digital assets is still cumbersome. Many businesses rely on ad-hoc methods for cold wallets and safekeeping of seed phrases. Solutions for institutional-grade custody (that don’t sacrifice self-sovereignty) are in demand, but the market has yet to fully mature.

Legal Structures & Compliance: Crypto startups often lack robust legal frameworks. Uncertainty in regulation leaves questions around how to structure entities, handle taxes, or comply with financial rules. This gap was evident – for example, general counsels in some regions report that specialist crypto knowledge is “absent at many of the… full-service firms” they’d typically turn to. The result is that many crypto ventures are winging it on legal and compliance matters. The need for solid guidance here is huge, especially as governments clarify rules. (Even Saylor’s formula included compliance as a key to success, underlining that playing within clear legal guardrails is essential.)

Procurement & Operational Workflows: The Bitcoin industry has grown up outside many traditional corporate processes. I noticed gaps in areas like procurement – for instance, how companies source mining equipment, software, or professional services. Many teams are startups used to bootstrapping, and they may not yet employ formal procurement strategies or vendor-management best practices. As Bitcoin companies scale, they’ll need more structured workflows for sourcing and negotiating with suppliers, ensuring cost efficiency and reliability. Streamlining these operational processes is an opportunity for improvement.

M&A and Transition Processes: The crypto sector is still fragmented, but consolidation is on the horizon. In fact, crypto mergers and acquisitions are already accelerating – 62 crypto M&A deals took place in Q1 2025, up from 33 just two quarters prior. This trend signals that many startups will face mergers, acquisitions, or other major transitions in the coming years. Yet, few crypto-native companies have experience with post-merger integration or the playbooks that more mature industries use to merge operations smoothly. Everything from due diligence and contract novation to blending corporate cultures is new territory. I see a gap in M&A transition planning – there’s a lack of frameworks for how a crypto company folds into a larger entity (or vice versa) without losing its momentum or violating regulatory requirements. With consolidation likely to continue, developing repeatable processes for M&A execution and integration will be critical.  (See Appendix 1 below for more details about 2025 M&A activity).

All of these gaps represent growing pains of an industry moving from its wild west phase into a more structured, institutional phase. Being at the conference felt like confirmation that Bitcoin’s ecosystem, while incredibly innovative, is still maturing in terms of the boring but necessary operational fundamentals.

Where Are the Traditional Service Firms?

One striking observation in Vegas was who was not in the room. Scanning the expo floor and speaker list, it became clear that the usual players in corporate consulting and legal advisement – the big law firms, the Big Four consulting and accounting firms, procurement specialists, and M&A integration consultants – were largely absent. In other tech sectors, these professionals swarm to offer their services, but in the Bitcoin/crypto space, they haven’t yet shown up in force.

Why the gap? It seems many traditional firms are still sitting on the sidelines, perhaps waiting for the industry to further mature or for clearer regulations before they invest heavily. As one compliance expert noted, among traditional finance (TradFi) compliance officers, engagement with crypto has been “limited, possibly because it’s such a new and complex frontier.” Many banks and funds are watching and waiting, expecting crypto to become more mainstream before they dive in. The same likely goes for large legal and consulting firms – they acknowledge the opportunity but have not fully committed resources to it yet.

For Bitcoin companies, this means a lot of needs are currently unmet. Growing startups can’t easily find a “Deloitte of crypto” or a seasoned legal operations team that knows the nuances of digital assets. Major opportunities exist for these service providers: advising on regulatory compliance programs, setting up procurement and supply-chain systems for hardware (like mining rigs), creating playbooks for post-merger integration of blockchain companies, and ensuring that when big money (e.g. private equity) comes into the space, there are experts to guide execution.

As someone with a foot in both the crypto world and the corporate M&A world, I see this as a huge opening. The first traditional professional service firms to deeply engage with crypto will add tremendous value – and will likely reap rewards as the ecosystem grows up. In short, the cavalry of experienced operators is coming, but isn’t fully here yet.

Bridging the Gap with In2Edge

This is where I believe In2Edge – my firm – has a pivotal role to play. In2Edge is built specifically to help companies navigate complex transitions at the intersection of traditional business and emerging technology like crypto. Our team has spent years developing an operational framework to guide organizations through M&A, integration, and process improvement, and those tools are perfectly suited for the challenges crypto companies face as they mature.

At In2Edge, we take an end-to-end approach to transition support, from pre-deal planning through post-merger integration. For example, we use a proven OASIS methodology (Organize, Analyze, Standardize, Institutionalize, Synergize) to streamline contract management during M&A – ensuring that when one company acquires another, every contract and obligation is captured and transitioned smoothly. We bring cross-functional expertise – our team includes project managers, attorneys, procurement specialists, and compliance officers – to provide holistic solutions. This means we can tackle legal entity structuring, establish robust compliance programs, and set up efficient procurement workflows all under one roof.

Our goal is to help clients maximize value and minimize risk during periods of change. Whether it’s a crypto startup preparing to be acquired by a larger firm, a Web3 project formalizing its supplier contracts, or a private equity operator looking to consolidate several blockchain companies, In2Edge offers the playbook and bench strength to execute these transitions effectively.

Summary

Attending Bitcoin 2025 reinforced my excitement about where this industry is headed – and also the work that still lies ahead to build the “boring” infrastructure that every thriving industry needs. The enthusiasm in Vegas was contagious; you could feel that Bitcoin’s story is still in its early chapters. But as the industry writes its next chapters, it will require blending visionary zeal with operational excellence. By addressing the gaps in security, legal structure, procurement, and M&A integration – and by inviting more traditional experts to the table – we can help Bitcoin businesses scale responsibly and sustainably. For companies and investors navigating this space, having a partner who understands both Bitcoin’s promise and the practicalities of corporate transitions can make all the difference. We’re excited to support those pioneering the future of crypto, ensuring that as the industry grows from its passionate beginnings into a stable, mature ecosystem, none of that hard-earned momentum is lost in transition. Lisa J. Scott – CEO & Founder, In2Edge.

Appendix 1 – M&A Deals

In Q1 2025, the cryptocurrency sector experienced a surge in mergers and acquisitions (M&A), with reports indicating between 61 and 85 deals completed during the quarter. While a comprehensive list of all transactions isn’t publicly available, several high-profile deals have been reported:

Kraken Acquires NinjaTrader for $1.5 Billion

Kraken, a leading cryptocurrency exchange, acquired NinjaTrader, a retail trading platform, for $1.5 billion. This acquisition was notable for the use of AI in streamlining the due diligence process.

Coinbase Acquires Deribit for $2.9 Billion

Coinbase announced its acquisition of Deribit, a Dubai-based cryptocurrency derivatives exchange, for $2.9 billion. This move aims to expand Coinbase’s presence in the crypto derivatives market.

Ripple Acquires Hidden Road for $1.25 Billion

Ripple, known for its digital payment protocol, acquired Hidden Road, a multi-asset prime broker, for $1.25 billion. This acquisition is expected to enhance Ripple’s institutional offerings.

Twenty One Capital’s $3.6 Billion SPAC Merger

Twenty One Capital, a Bitcoin-focused company backed by Tether, Bitfinex, and SoftBank, announced plans to go public through a $3.6 billion SPAC merger. This strategy mirrors MicroStrategy’s approach of holding significant Bitcoin reserves.

These deals highlight the growing institutional interest and consolidation within the crypto industry. For a more detailed overview of Q1 2025 crypto M&A activity, the Architect Partners’ Q1 2025 Crypto M&A and Financing Report provides comprehensive insights.

Appendix 2 – Primary Sources and Reports

Bitcoin Conference 2025 Attendance & Location: Public event data and media coverage confirmed 35,000+ attendees at the Venetian, Las Vegas.

Michael Saylor’s Keynote – “21 Ways to Wealth”: Summarized from livestream and transcript excerpts shared across Bitcoin Magazine and social media during the event.

Crypto M&A Activity – Architect Partners Q1 2025 Crypto M&A and Financing Report

https://architectpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Q1-2025-Crypto-MA-and-Financing-Report.pdf

Kraken Acquires NinjaTrader for $1.5B – Business Insider

https://www.businessinsider.com

Coinbase Acquires Deribit for $2.9B – Investor’s Business Daily

https://www.investors.com

Ripple Acquires Hidden Road for $1.25B – Reuters

https://www.reuters.com

Twenty One Capital SPAC Merger ($3.6B): Wall Street Journal coverage on crypto IPO trends

https://www.wsj.com

Analysis & Background Insights

FASB Accounting Update (2025 Fair Value for Crypto): Financial Accounting Standards Board announcements

https://fasb.org

OFAC & FinCEN Compliance Expectations for Crypto Businesses: U.S. Treasury guidelines and past enforcement actions

https://home.treasury.gov

General Market Commentary on Seed Phrase Security: Reports from Swan Bitcoin, Unchained Capital, Casa, and Ledger on usability and custody challenges.

Lisa Scott’s Operationalization Framework

Internal research and strategy materials from In2Edge: OASIS Cycle and Transition Playbooks

Bitcoin was the first.

The spark that lit the flame of decentralized finance.

The digital asset that challenged everything we thought we knew about money.

Today, thousands of cryptocurrencies exist. Many claim to improve on Bitcoin or serve entirely different purposes. Yet among early adopters and purists, a belief persists:

“There is only Bitcoin.”

These are the Bitcoin maximalists—those who argue that all other cryptocurrencies are unnecessary at best, and scams at worst.

But are they right?

Is Bitcoin truly the only legitimate blockchain-based asset?

Or do other cryptos, especially utility tokens, have a meaningful role in a broader financial revolution?

Let’s explore the debate.

Why Bitcoin Is the Foundation

Bitcoin was launched in 2009 with a clear mission:

• Create digital cash that requires no trusted third party
• Use proof-of-work and a fixed supply to ensure scarcity and security
• Build a public, permissionless ledger that anyone can verify

It solved the “double spend” problem and introduced a new kind of decentralized consensus.

Today, Bitcoin is:

• The most recognized and adopted cryptocurrency
• The most secure blockchain by hashrate
• A store of value for individuals and institutions
• Often referred to as “digital gold”
• It’s slow by design. Simple on purpose. Resistant to change—because stability is its greatest strength.

Why Bitcoin Maximalists Don’t Trust Other Cryptos

Bitcoin maximalists believe that:

• Most other cryptocurrencies violate the principles of decentralization
• Many projects are corporate-controlled, pre-mined, or inflationary
• Other chains are often less secure, more centralized, or not battle-tested
• Altcoins (especially those with founders or marketing teams) resemble startups, not protocols

They also argue that many crypto projects:

• Reintroduce trust where Bitcoin eliminated it
• Overpromise utility and under-deliver real-world adoption
• Encourage short-term speculation, not long-term value

In their view, Bitcoin is not just superior—it is sufficient.

But Is There Room for Other Crypto?

Yes—and here’s the argument:

1. Bitcoin is Value. Other Cryptos Are Infrastructure.

• Bitcoin is the store of value and foundation of digital scarcity
• But Ethereum and others allow programmable money—smart contracts, DAOs, DeFi
• Utility tokens power decentralized apps, storage, identity, and data exchange

Bitcoin can’t (by design) do everything. It’s not built for speed, smart contracts, or customizable tokens. It’s the base layer—not the application layer.

2. Many Tokens Serve Real, Distinct Purposes

ETH (Ethereum): Powers smart contracts, gas for dApps

LINK (Chainlink): Brings real-world data to blockchains

XRP: Enables cross-border payments & liquidity

MATIC (Polygon): Scales Ethereum with faster, cheaper transactions

FIL (Filecoin): Decentralized storage marketplace

USDC/DAI: Stablecoins for global payments and DeFi

These aren’t trying to be Bitcoin. They’re serving functional, niche roles in a new kind of economy.

3. Different Layers, One Ecosystem

Think of crypto like the internet:

• Bitcoin = TCP/IP — the base protocol, secure and foundational
• Ethereum and others = HTTP, APIs, apps — interactive, flexible, evolving
• Stablecoins = familiar user interfaces — the bridge between new and old systems

They’re not in conflict—they’re layers in a stack.

Each layer brings something necessary to a decentralized future.

But Caution Is Warranted

Bitcoin maximalists aren’t wrong to be cautious.

Many altcoins:

• Have poor security
• Are backed by hype, not function
• Lack decentralization
• Inflate supply or change rules arbitrarily
• Disappear as quickly as they launch

Caution is healthy. Blind loyalty isn’t.

Final Thought: Bitcoin Is the Foundation. But Foundations Support Structures.

Bitcoin is the root of trust in crypto.

It’s the anchor. The hardest, most secure form of value we’ve seen in digital form.

But the new financial system we’re building may require more than just sound money.

It may also need:

• Smart contracts
• Decentralized identity
• Stable assets
• Tokenized ownership
• Scalable, flexible platforms

We shouldn’t blindly trust every new token—but we also shouldn’t ignore innovation built on top of the foundation that Bitcoin laid.

Bitcoin started the revolution.

The rest of crypto may carry it forward.

In the world of Bitcoin, you’ll often hear phrases like:

“Run your own node.”

“Don’t trust—verify.”

But what exactly is a node?

Do you need one? And what does it actually do?

Let’s break it down in simple terms.

What Is a Bitcoin Node?

A node is a computer that runs Bitcoin software and connects to the Bitcoin network. It’s a bit like a server in a decentralized internet—but instead of hosting websites, it verifies truth.

At its core, a node does three powerful things:

• Validates every transaction and block against Bitcoin’s rules
• Keeps a copy of the full blockchain—Bitcoin’s global transaction history
• Connects with other nodes to share and receive real-time data

There are no bosses in Bitcoin. Instead, it’s a network of tens of thousands of nodes around the world, all agreeing on what’s real by running the same open-source code.

What Is a Full Node vs. a Lightweight Node?

A full node downloads and checks the entire blockchain (over 500 GB and growing). It enforces every rule and doesn’t trust any third party.

A lightweight node (used by many mobile wallets) trusts full nodes for some information and doesn’t verify everything itself.

When Bitcoin advocates say “run your own node,” they’re usually referring to full nodes—the gold standard of Bitcoin security.

Why Do People Run a Node?

1. To Verify Everything Themselves

With your own node:

• You don’t have to trust a wallet app or exchange to tell you how much Bitcoin you have.
• You know for sure if a transaction is valid or not.
• You enforce Bitcoin’s real rules—not someone else’s version of them.

2. To Improve Privacy

Most mobile wallets leak data to third parties. But when you connect your wallet to your own node, your activity stays private.

3. To Strengthen the Network

Every node contributes to the health of the Bitcoin ecosystem:

• It resists censorship
• It ensures redundancy
• It makes Bitcoin more resilient

Running a node is like casting a vote for financial sovereignty—not just for yourself, but for the network as a whole.

4. To Use Advanced Tools

Many advanced Bitcoin tools and features work best with a personal node:

• Multisignature wallets
• Lightning Network channels
• Local signing for self-custody wallets
• Private transaction broadcasting

How Can You Run a Node?

You don’t need to be a tech wizard. There are three main ways to run a node:

• Install Bitcoin Core on your computer (free, open-source)
• Use plug-and-play hardware like Start9, Umbrel, or MyNode
• Host it in the cloud (less private, more technical)

It takes some disk space and time to sync, but once set up, it runs quietly in the background, keeping you sovereign.

Do You Need a Node to Use Bitcoin?

No. You can buy, send, and receive Bitcoin without running a node.

But if you want full control, privacy, and independence, running a node is the ultimate expression of Bitcoin’s promise:

Don’t trust. Verify.

Final Thought: Your Node, Your Rules

In today’s world, most systems ask you to trust them.

Your bank, your apps, your government.

But Bitcoin flips that script.

It gives you the tools to verify everything yourself—no permission needed.

Running a node might seem like a small act, but it’s a powerful one.

Because when truth is decentralized, power becomes distributed.

And that’s what this financial revolution is really about.