Thinking Outside the Box and Being Brave: A Guide to Unleashing Your Creative Potential (Bonus: Case Study)

In a world that often rewards conformity and predictability, thinking outside the box and embracing bravery can set you apart as a creative force, a leader, or simply someone who sees beyond the ordinary. Whether you’re looking to solve complex business challenges, improve your personal life, or unlock new opportunities, thinking outside the box and being brave are essential skills that can be learned and cultivated.

What Does It Mean to Think Outside the Box?

Thinking outside the box means breaking free from traditional ways of thinking. It involves challenging the status quo, questioning assumptions, and exploring unconventional solutions. It’s about stepping out of your comfort zone and embracing new perspectives, even if they seem far-fetched at first.

Thinking outside the box doesn’t just mean coming up with quirky or unusual ideas. Instead, it’s about using creativity to find effective solutions that others might overlook. This mindset can help you innovate, solve problems more efficiently, and stay ahead in an ever-evolving world.

Why Bravery Matters in Creative Thinking

Creativity and bravery go hand in hand. Coming up with original ideas and daring to share them requires courage. You might face criticism, skepticism, or even failure. But bravery is what allows you to take those creative leaps, to push forward with your ideas, and to learn from setbacks.

Being brave is not about being fearless; rather, it’s about taking action despite the fear. It’s about believing in your ideas and not being afraid to challenge conventions, even when others doubt you. History is filled with examples of individuals who changed the world by bravely thinking differently—whether it was Steve Jobs with the iPhone, Marie Curie’s scientific breakthroughs, or Martin Luther King Jr.’s civil rights leadership.

How to Cultivate “Out-of-the-Box” Thinking

1. Challenge Your Assumptions

We often operate under a set of assumptions without even realizing it. To think outside the box, you need to question everything. Ask yourself why things are done a certain way. Is there a better, simpler, or more innovative approach?

Exercise: Write down a challenge you’re facing and list the assumptions you have about it. For each assumption, ask, “What if the opposite were true?”

2. Seek Inspiration from Unrelated Fields

Innovation often comes from borrowing ideas from one field and applying them to another. For instance, the design of Velcro was inspired by how burrs stuck to a dog’s fur. By looking beyond your usual sources of inspiration, you can find unique solutions.

Exercise: Read a book, listen to a podcast, or watch a documentary on a subject you know nothing about. Look for connections between that new knowledge and your current projects.

3. Embrace Failure as a Learning Tool

Fear of failure is one of the biggest barriers to thinking outside the box. Instead of seeing failure as a negative outcome, view it as a stepping stone to success. The most successful people in the world have all faced failure—but they used those experiences to refine their ideas and approach.

Tip: Create a “failure journal” where you document what you learned from each mistake or setback. This practice will help you see failure as a source of growth rather than a reason to give up.

4. Surround Yourself with Diverse Perspectives

Collaborating with people who think differently from you can help you see challenges from new angles. Whether it’s in business or your personal life, diversity of thought leads to richer ideas and solutions.

Action Step: Join a group or network where members come from different backgrounds, industries, or cultures. Encourage open dialogue and be willing to listen to perspectives that challenge your own.

5. Practice Mindfulness and Reflection

Being brave enough to think differently requires mental clarity. Mindfulness practices like meditation can help quiet the noise of doubt, fear, and external pressures. Taking time to reflect on your thoughts allows you to focus on what truly matters.

Exercise: Spend a few minutes each day journaling about your thoughts, challenges, and creative ideas. This helps you process your thoughts more deeply and can reveal hidden insights.

How to Be Brave When Thinking Outside the Box

1. Start Small but Act Consistently

Bravery doesn’t require grand gestures. Start by taking small, calculated risks that push you slightly beyond your comfort zone. Over time, your confidence will grow, making it easier to take on bigger challenges.

Example: Speak up with a new idea in a meeting, even if it feels uncomfortable. The more you practice, the easier it becomes to share your thoughts openly.

2. Visualize Success and Embrace the Possibility of Failure

Our minds are powerful tools that can shape our reality. Visualization is a technique used by athletes, entrepreneurs, and leaders to prepare themselves mentally for success. However, being brave also means acknowledging that failure is a possibility—and being okay with it.

Exercise: Before embarking on a risky venture, visualize both the best-case and worst-case scenarios. By preparing yourself for potential outcomes, you’ll feel less fear and more control.

3. Develop a Support System

Surround yourself with people who believe in your potential. A strong support system can provide encouragement when you’re feeling uncertain or discouraged. Find mentors, colleagues, or friends who inspire you to be courageous in your thinking.

Action Step: Seek out communities of like-minded individuals who are also committed to personal growth and creativity.

The Benefits of Thinking Differently and Being Brave

Improved Problem-Solving: Innovative thinkers can tackle challenges from new angles, often finding solutions that others overlook.

Personal Growth: Being brave and thinking creatively can help you break free from self-imposed limitations, leading to personal and professional growth.

Increased Resilience: Embracing risks and learning from failures make you more resilient, preparing you to face future challenges with confidence.

Career Advancement: Companies highly value employees who can think innovatively and are willing to take calculated risks to achieve goals.

Final Thoughts

Thinking outside the box and being brave are not talents reserved for the few—they are skills that anyone can develop with the right mindset and strategies. By challenging assumptions, embracing new perspectives, and cultivating courage, you can unlock your creative potential and make meaningful changes in your life and work.

Remember: the world is full of possibilities, but only for those who are willing to step outside the confines of what is known and familiar. So, dare to be different. Be brave enough to think big, and you’ll find that the box was never really there in the first place.

Case Study

Context: Alex is a project manager at a tech company, tasked with finding a way to cut down the time it takes for their product development team to bring a new software feature to market. The current process takes six months, but their biggest competitor just announced they can do it in four months. Alex has been struggling with this challenge for weeks, and today, she decides to think outside the box.

Internal Dialogue Example:

“Okay, Alex, let’s approach this differently. I’ve been stuck on this problem for weeks now, trying to optimize the current process. But what if the solution isn’t about making tweaks here and there? What if we’re fundamentally doing this wrong?

The team always starts with requirements gathering, then moves on to design, coding, testing, and deployment. It’s the traditional waterfall approach because it’s how we’ve always done things. But wait… the industry is moving towards agile, right? Could that work here? But the team is resistant to change and shifting to agile feels like a massive overhaul.

Alright, let’s put that thought on the back burner for a second. What’s another angle? What’s slowing us down the most? It’s the approval process, isn’t it? The endless back and forth between departments. Everything gets bottlenecked when it has to go through multiple hands. I keep trying to get people to move faster, but… what if the problem isn’t the speed, but the structure? What if we didn’t need all these approvals in the first place?

That’s it! What if we empowered smaller teams to make their own decisions, at least for less critical features? Could I create a “fast lane” where certain projects don’t need to go through the entire bureaucracy? I mean, it sounds risky, but the risk might be worth it if we can shave off weeks.

But wait… what’s the worst that could happen if we tried this? Maybe a feature doesn’t come out perfect, but we’d still have time to fix it before the full release. Better to move fast and iterate than stay stuck in this never-ending cycle of approvals.

Ugh, but what will the executives think? They’re so set on doing things by the book. I’ll have to convince them with some data. Okay, new plan: pilot this with one small team, track the results, and present the data. If it shows we can cut down the timeline by even a few weeks, they might go for it.

But how do I get the team on board? They’re already overwhelmed. Hmm… maybe I can position this as a way to cut out unnecessary headaches and give them more autonomy. I know Sarah in dev has been itching for more control over her projects. If I can get her excited, she can rally the others.

Alright, Alex, here’s the game plan: propose the “fast lane” idea in the next meeting, focus on the benefits—speed, autonomy, less red tape. Don’t get bogged down in the details yet. Just get them excited about the possibilities. Then, start a small pilot with Sarah’s team. If it works, we’ll have the data to back it up.

This feels risky… but also exciting. I’m so tired of banging my head against the wall trying to optimize the old way. Let’s do it. What’s the worst that can happen? If it fails, at least I’ll have tried something different. And who knows—it might just be the breakthrough we need.”

Result: Energized by this new idea, Alex decides to stop refining the existing process and instead proposes a pilot program to streamline decision-making. By taking a creative risk and thinking beyond traditional methods, she finds a potential solution that could transform how her team operates.

Conversation with an 8-Year-Old Boy: Simplifying the Complex World of Technology and Integration

Setting: Lisa is sitting with her 8-year-old son, Alex, who’s curious about what his mom does and what her guests like Phil, Vidur, and Jim talk about on her podcast. Lisa decides to break down some of the complex topics in a way Alex can understand.

Alex: Mom, what do you talk about on your podcast? Is it like Roblox or Minecraft?

Lisa: Kind of! But instead of avatars with accessories, I talk to people who are heroes in business. They help companies work better together, like when you and your friends share toys and games to have more fun.

Alex: Oh! So like when I bring my Legos to share with Joey, and we build something super big together?

Lisa: Exactly! But imagine if you and Joey had different kinds of Legos. Maybe your Legos are big blocks, and Joey’s are tiny. When you try to build something together, it might not fit at first. That’s what happens when companies merge, or combine—they have to figure out how to work together with different pieces.

Introducing Phil Abraham: The Futurist

Alex: That sounds tricky. So what does Phil do?

Lisa: Well, Phil is like a scientist who thinks about the future and how technology can help people and companies. He helps make things easier by using computers and robots to do some of the hard work.

Alex: Like using a robot to clean my room?

Lisa: Yes, exactly! But instead of cleaning rooms, Phil helps companies clean up their messy data and make sure everything works smoothly together. Think of it like using a robot to organize your toy box so you can find everything faster.

Alex: Oh, I wish I had that!

Lisa: Haha, me too!

Explaining Vidur Bhandari: The Puzzle Master

Alex: What about Vidur? What does he do?

Lisa: Vidur is like a puzzle master. When two companies join, they have lots of different pieces, like different teams, computers, and ways of doing things. Vidur helps them fit all those pieces together to make one big picture, kind of like finishing a giant jigsaw puzzle.

Alex: So he’s like when I help my friends put together their Lego sets and find the missing pieces?

Lisa: That’s right! He makes sure everything fits just right, so the companies can work together without getting confused.

Talking About Jim Buckley: The Fixer

Alex: And what about Jim? Is he like a puzzle master too?

Lisa: Jim is more like a fixer. Imagine if you were playing with a toy car, and one of the wheels broke off. Jim would be the one who figures out how to fix it so you can keep playing. In companies, sometimes things don’t go as planned when they join together. Jim helps fix those problems so everything runs smoothly.

Alex: Oh, so he’s like when I fix my remote-control car?

Lisa: Exactly! But instead of cars, he’s fixing problems with computers, people, and different parts of companies.

Simplifying AI and Integration

Alex: You talk about something called AI. What’s that?

Lisa: AI stands for “artificial intelligence.” It’s like having a super-smart helper who can learn things on its own. Imagine if you had a toy robot that could learn how to do your math homework for you.

Alex: Whoa! That would be good!

Lisa: It would! But the trick is to make sure the robot does things the right way. Phil, Vidur, and Jim help companies use these smart robots to make their work easier, but they also make sure the robots don’t get confused and mess things up.

Alex: So, they’re like robot teachers?

Lisa: Yes, that’s a great way to think of it! They teach robots how to help companies without making mistakes.

Exploring Complexity with a Simple Analogy

Alex: You also said something about “commmmplexxityy.” What’s that?

Lisa: Complexity means things can get very complicated and messy. Imagine you have a hundred different toys, but they’re all mixed up in one big pile. Trying to find your favorite toy car in that mess would be really hard, right?

Alex: Yeah, I’d never find it!

Lisa: Exactly. Phil is really good at helping companies organize their messes, just like you would organize your toys by putting cars in one box, action figures in another, and Legos in another. That way, they can find what they need really fast.

Alex: So he’s like a super organizer!

Lisa: That’s right! And that’s how he helps companies work faster and smarter.

Final Thoughts: The Future

Alex: So, what will all these people be doing in the future?

Lisa: Well, they’re trying to make sure companies can use new technology like AI and robots to do things better. Phil even works on super-smart robots that might one day help us with things we haven’t even thought of yet—like maybe a robot that can make dinner or help doctors find cures for diseases.

Alex: That sounds like the future is going to be pretty cool!

Lisa: It will be! And people like Phil, Vidur, and Jim are working hard to make sure it’s a future where we can all live better, safer, and happier lives.

Alex: Maybe one day I can help companies too! But first, I need to get better at my math homework.

Lisa: Haha, yes, that’s a great start! And who knows, maybe you’ll be the one teaching robots how to do it for you!

About the Podcast:

M&A+ The Art After the Deal is your go-to resource for uncovering the real stories behind M&A integrations. Join host Lisa Scott as she brings in industry experts to share their experiences, lessons learned, and strategies for successful post-deal integration. Subscribe for insights.

Connect with Us:

Website: www.in2edge.com

Podcast: M&A+ The Art After the Deal – YouTube

How the M&A Environment Could Change Under a Trump Presidency

If Donald Trump were to return to the U.S. presidency, the M&A environment could see a shift influenced by his administration’s policies on taxes, deregulation, foreign investment, and trade. Known for his “America First” agenda, Trump would likely continue to promote a pro-business stance focused on reducing taxes and regulatory barriers. However, his policies on foreign investment and trade could add complexities, especially for cross-border deals. This article explores how a Trump presidency could impact mergers and acquisitions, examining the potential effects on taxes, regulatory scrutiny, industry-specific considerations, and the broader investment landscape.

1. Tax Policy: Lower Rates, Higher Cash Flow

Trump has been a strong proponent of lowering taxes, particularly for corporations. During his previous administration, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) reduced the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, which led to increased cash flow for many companies. If Trump were to take office again, he might push for further tax cuts or extend the TCJA provisions set to expire in the coming years.

Impact on M&A:

Lower corporate taxes increase cash reserves, giving companies more resources for acquisitions. This could lead to a boost in M&A activity, as companies have more capital to reinvest in growth opportunities. Additionally, lower taxes may lead to higher valuations, as reduced tax liabilities improve companies’ bottom lines. Under Trump, M&A could see increased volume and deal size, especially in sectors with strong cash flow like tech, healthcare, and manufacturing.

2. Deregulation: A Pro-Business Environment

Trump’s previous administration was characterized by a commitment to reducing regulations across industries. Trump may seek to revive his approach to deregulation, rolling back rules in sectors such as energy, finance, and manufacturing. By reducing regulatory oversight, Trump could make it easier for companies to pursue deals with fewer compliance hurdles.

Impact on M&A:

A less regulated environment could benefit M&A by speeding up the approval process for deals and lowering compliance costs. For example, in the energy sector, reduced environmental regulations could make it easier for companies to acquire or merge with others in fossil fuels, pipelines, or manufacturing. Deregulation may also allow financial institutions more flexibility in M&A, as they would face fewer regulatory constraints on deal structure and strategy. However, industries like tech and telecom might still see some scrutiny if there are concerns about market monopolization or consumer rights, especially given the public’s ongoing attention to data privacy and competition.

3. Foreign Investment and Trade Policy

Trump’s stance on trade and foreign investment has been marked by protectionism, focusing on reshoring jobs and limiting the influence of foreign (especially Chinese) companies in the U.S. economy. If re-elected, Trump may intensify his focus on national security concerns tied to foreign ownership of American companies, with stricter scrutiny on deals involving foreign investors. This could include an increase in the role of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to evaluate transactions with potential national security risks.

Impact on M&A:

Foreign investment in the U.S. could face heightened scrutiny under Trump, particularly deals involving critical industries like technology, defense, and telecommunications. For cross-border M&A, this may result in longer approval times and greater uncertainty, which could discourage foreign buyers from pursuing U.S.-based targets. Companies seeking to acquire assets outside the U.S. could also encounter challenges if Trump’s administration imposes new trade restrictions or tariffs, as seen in the U.S.-China trade war during his previous term. Overall, Trump’s policies could shift M&A activity to a more domestic focus, with companies favoring U.S. targets over foreign acquisitions.

4. Reshoring and Domestic M&A Growth

A key part of Trump’s economic strategy has been the reshoring of jobs and manufacturing. Trump’s administration incentivized U.S. companies to bring jobs back from overseas and invest in domestic operations. If he takes office again, we could expect similar policies encouraging companies to focus on U.S.-based acquisitions and investments, possibly with tax benefits or other incentives for domestic M&A.

Impact on M&A:

Reshoring incentives could lead to a rise in domestic M&A activity, especially in manufacturing, logistics, and supply chain-focused industries. Companies may seek to acquire U.S.-based suppliers or manufacturers to strengthen their domestic supply chains and reduce reliance on foreign partners. Trump’s focus on strengthening domestic industries could create attractive opportunities for M&A within sectors such as industrials, construction, and energy.

5. Industry-Specific Impacts: Energy, Tech, and Healthcare

Energy:

Trump’s support for traditional energy sectors such as oil, gas, and coal would likely lead to policies favoring these industries. Reduced environmental regulations could open up opportunities for mergers and acquisitions among fossil fuel companies, as well as investment in infrastructure and energy projects that may have been previously restricted

Technology:

While Trump favors a hands-off regulatory approach for most sectors, his administration has shown interest in regulating big tech, particularly with regard to social media and companies perceived as having political bias. However, tech companies in other areas, such as artificial intelligence and cybersecurity, may be targeted for stricter controls if foreign involvement is seen as a national security risk.

Healthcare:

Trump’s past initiatives included efforts to reduce drug prices and repeal parts of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). A Trump administration would likely favor deregulation in healthcare, making it easier for healthcare companies to pursue consolidation without extensive regulatory scrutiny. Lower regulatory barriers could stimulate M&A in pharmaceuticals, hospital systems, and health insurance.

Impact on M&A:

Trump’s industry-focused policies could drive M&A in specific sectors. Energy companies might see fewer regulatory constraints, making it easier to merge and expand, while healthcare companies could benefit from looser regulatory oversight on pricing and consolidation. Tech firms may pursue M&A for growth, although some areas, like data privacy, could still face regulatory hurdles, especially if foreign investors are involved.

6. Labor and Employment Policy: Impact on Cost Synergies

Trump’s administration would likely continue pro-business labor policies, which tend to favor employers over employees. This could include resisting increases to the minimum wage and relaxing certain labor protections, making it less costly for companies to pursue M&A deals that depend on achieving cost synergies through workforce restructuring.

Impact on M&A:

A more employer-friendly labor environment could make it easier for companies to achieve cost synergies in M&A, especially in labor-intensive industries such as retail, hospitality, and manufacturing. If companies face fewer legal constraints on downsizing or restructuring, they may be more willing to pursue M&A with an eye toward optimizing costs and streamlining operations. However, labor-related M&A strategies could face public criticism, so companies would need to balance operational goals with reputational considerations.

7. ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) Impact and Public Perception

Trump’s administration would likely de-emphasize environmental and social governance (ESG) regulations, potentially rolling back certain climate-related policies and making ESG a lower priority. Trump’s view on environmental regulations could give companies more flexibility in pursuing deals that may have previously faced scrutiny for their environmental impact.

Impact on M&A:

Under a Trump administration, companies may feel less pressure to prioritize ESG in M&A, which could reduce compliance costs for some deals. However, many investors and consumers are increasingly focused on ESG, so companies may still choose to prioritize it voluntarily to maintain market competitiveness and meet investor expectations. M&A teams will need to weigh the reduced regulatory focus on ESG against the reputational benefits of maintaining high ESG standards.

Conclusion: The Future of M&A Under a Trump Presidency

A Trump presidency would likely bring significant changes to the M&A environment, creating both opportunities and challenges. Reduced taxes, deregulation, and a pro-business stance could lead to a more active M&A landscape, particularly in energy, manufacturing, and domestic industries. Companies could have more flexibility to pursue deals with fewer regulatory obstacles and lower compliance costs, encouraging a higher volume of transactions.

However, Trump’s protectionist stance and focus on national security could make cross-border M&A more challenging, especially in critical industries like technology and defense. Foreign investors may face additional scrutiny, and U.S. companies may find it difficult to engage in cross-border deals in regions where trade relations are uncertain.

For M&A professionals, a Trump presidency would require careful navigation of regulatory and political landscapes, with a focus on domestic opportunities and industries likely to benefit from deregulation. By aligning M&A strategies with Trump’s policies, companies can capture growth and build resilience in an environment that favors American businesses and prioritizes domestic investment.

The Importance of Execution in M&A: Why Fancy Presentations Can’t Replace Action

In the world of mergers and acquisitions (M&A), much of the attention is often placed on strategy and planning. Deals are typically kicked off with impressive presentations that outline the vision, synergies, and projected ROI. Slides are meticulously designed, full of high-level insights and strategic goals, while the executive team leaves the room buzzing with optimism. But, as any seasoned M&A professional knows, real success doesn’t stem from what’s on the slides; it’s rooted in execution. Without precise, diligent follow-through, even the most promising deal can falter.

Let’s explore why execution—not just planning—is essential in M&A, and why impressive presentations can only take you so far.

1. Execution Transforms Strategy into Results

Presentations and strategy decks are vital tools in M&A, offering a clear outline of the goals and the strategic benefits of the deal. However, they’re only the starting point. Execution is the process that translates those high-level visions into actionable steps that bring tangible results. Without flawless execution, even the most compelling strategy remains just an idea. It’s the difference between a theoretical roadmap and actually getting the deal across the finish line.

Executing an M&A integration plan requires hands-on effort. It involves tackling operational challenges, bridging gaps between different company cultures, ensuring data and system compatibility, and making quick adjustments as new obstacles arise. Execution is where value creation truly happens.

2. Presentations Are Temporary; Execution is Lasting

Presentations may impress in the boardroom, but once the slides are closed, the work truly begins. An M&A deal is like a marathon, and the presentation is simply the starting gun. To get to the finish line requires sustained effort, constant adjustment, and a relentless focus on the details that make or break the deal’s success.

Execution is about continuity. It’s about having a team that can translate the plan into the hundreds of small but critical actions needed to bring the deal to life. Without proper follow-through, the initial excitement fades, leaving the business to deal with integration issues, inefficiencies, and, often, disappointed shareholders.

3. Execution Means Addressing Real-World Problems

Strategic presentations tend to focus on the “what” and the “why” of the deal, showcasing the potential synergies and projected benefits. But execution tackles the “how.” In the real world, integration is rarely as smooth as a PowerPoint presentation suggests. Execution means getting into the nitty-gritty, addressing unexpected challenges, and adapting on the fly to ensure things run smoothly.

For example, take a merger between two firms with different IT infrastructures. The presentation might show a seamless data migration plan, but the reality often involves unexpected technical incompatibilities, data discrepancies, and cybersecurity concerns. Only a dedicated team with an execution-focused approach can tackle these real-world problems effectively.

4. Execution Builds Trust Among Employees and Stakeholders

In any M&A scenario, employees and stakeholders often feel uncertain or even skeptical about the deal. They’ve seen promising presentations before, and many have experienced deals that didn’t live up to their potential. Execution, on the other hand, builds trust.

When stakeholders see that the team is delivering on its promises, moving forward with concrete actions, and achieving early wins, their confidence grows. Employees are more likely to buy into the integration process if they see effective leadership, practical steps toward a shared culture, and a commitment to the company’s success. Execution proves that the deal isn’t just about slides and projections; it’s about creating a sustainable, successful future.

5. Execution Uncovers Opportunities for Innovation

One often overlooked benefit of an execution-focused approach is the opportunity it creates for innovation. During integration, teams encounter challenges and obstacles that can inspire creative solutions. Execution gives leaders and teams the space to discover new ways to approach problems, optimize processes, and even innovate new products or services.

For example, during the integration process, teams might identify inefficiencies in workflows or gaps in product offerings. These insights are unlikely to emerge from a presentation alone; they’re discovered through hands-on work. Execution allows companies to harness these opportunities and turn them into real, value-added initiatives.

6. Execution Holds the Key to Real Value Creation

Ultimately, M&A deals are about creating value—whether through cost efficiencies, revenue growth, or strategic expansion. But value creation doesn’t happen on slides; it happens in the day-to-day actions of the integration process. Execution is what drives synergy realization, uncovers hidden value, and sets the stage for long-term success.

In many cases, the initial vision presented in strategy decks evolves during the integration phase. Execution allows companies to refine and adjust their approach based on what actually works. It’s a flexible process, not a rigid set of directives, and that flexibility is essential for maximizing the deal’s potential.

The Danger of Over-Emphasizing Presentations

In many organizations, there’s an emphasis on developing elaborate presentations and reports. But over-emphasizing this planning stage can lead to “analysis paralysis” and a tendency to over-forecast without taking the necessary steps to execute effectively. While presentations are valuable, they shouldn’t overshadow the need for a capable team that can bring the strategy to life.

Investing too heavily in presentations can also create a false sense of security. Teams may feel like they’re progressing simply because the strategy looks good on paper. But as every successful dealmaker knows, what counts is the ability to translate that strategy into action.

In2edge: Making Execution the Priority

At In2edge, we recognize the critical importance of execution in M&A. We pride ourselves on being more than just strategists; we’re implementers. While we understand the value of a strong strategic vision, we know that execution is where success is truly determined. Our team is dedicated to working alongside clients to deliver concrete, sustainable outcomes that drive real value.

In short, successful M&A requires more than fancy presentations. It requires action, accountability, and a relentless focus on results. Execution is the engine that drives the deal’s success, and it’s what turns a great vision into a lasting reality.

Harnessing Technology for Enhanced Procurement Transition During M&A Spin-offs

In the dynamic landscape of mergers and acquisitions, particularly with M&A spin-offs, the role of technology has become central to achieving a smooth and strategic transition. As companies navigate the complexities of procurement transitions, technology offers a foundation for ensuring the process is efficient, data-driven, and resilient against errors.

This white paper, Harnessing Technology for Enhanced Procurement Transition During M&A Spin-offs, explores how modern technology is transforming procurement processes during M&A spin-offs, focusing on the integration of historical data analysis, real-time dashboards, and automated workflows. These technological advancements empower companies to take a holistic approach, giving them the insights and tools necessary to manage transitions effectively.

One of the standout aspects of this paper is its examination of how Alternative Legal Services Providers (ALSPs) are reshaping procurement transitions. With a deep well of data at their disposal, ALSPs, like in2edge, offer unique expertise and streamlined processes to support M&A transitions. The data-driven insights these providers bring to the table are invaluable, offering clients an unparalleled advantage in achieving error-free, timely procurement processes and ensuring compliance with new corporate structures post-spin-off.

Key Insights from the White Paper:

1. Historical Data Analysis: Leveraging past data helps companies make informed decisions and anticipate potential challenges, providing a roadmap for navigating the intricate aspects of procurement during spin-offs.

2. Real-Time Dashboards: By implementing real-time dashboards, companies can monitor procurement activities continuously, identify bottlenecks early, and track key performance metrics, leading to a proactive rather than reactive management approach.

3. Automated Approvals and Workflows: Automation reduces administrative burdens, streamlines communication, and minimizes errors, creating a smoother and faster transition.

4. ALSP Expertise and Data Repository: ALSPs bring a unique advantage with their deep knowledge and specialized data repositories, which can drive efficiency and ensure compliance in ways traditional methods may not achieve.

In today’s fast-paced M&A environment, companies that harness these technological advantages stand a better chance of realizing successful transitions. As this white paper details, a technology-focused, data-driven approach is no longer optional but essential for achieving strategic success.

Read the full white paper here.

Supplier Onboarding in Spin-Off Transitions: Requirements, Workarounds, and Tracking

As companies undergo spin-off transitions, onboarding suppliers becomes a critical task that requires balancing immediate operational needs with long-term strategic goals. Spin-offs often need to establish independent supplier relationships swiftly, creating a unique context for supplier onboarding compared to typical scenarios. Here’s a breakdown of the key onboarding requirements, common workarounds during transitions, and how technology plays a crucial role in tracking these activities.

Key Supplier Onboarding Requirements for Spin-Offs

1. Supplier Registration and Due Diligence: A foundational step for new and existing suppliers, registration ensures that all parties have a clear understanding of the contractual terms. During a spin-off, gathering information such as company details, tax identification, and primary contacts is essential for setting up independent supplier profiles. Due diligence, including financial health assessments and risk evaluation, helps confirm that suppliers can support the new entity effectively.

2. Compliance with Legal and Regulatory Standards: Spin-offs must ensure that suppliers comply with industry regulations and standards, including labor laws, safety protocols, and environmental guidelines. This may involve verifying certifications (e.g., ISO for quality standards) and regulatory adherence, especially if the supplier was originally tied to the parent company’s compliance infrastructure.

3. Insurance and Liability Coverage: Given the potential risks involved, insurance verification remains critical in spin-offs. Ensuring that suppliers carry sufficient liability and indemnity coverage protects the new entity from operational and legal risks associated with third-party relationships.

4. Transitionary Quality and Performance Metrics: Spin-offs often require rapid transitions, which can lead to adjustments in quality and performance benchmarks for suppliers. Setting clear performance metrics (KPIs) tailored to transitional requirements ensures that suppliers are meeting quality standards without compromising delivery timelines or efficiency.

Differences in Supplier Onboarding: Separated vs. Net New Suppliers

In a spin-off, suppliers generally fall into two categories: separated suppliers (those already serving the seller/divesting company) and net new suppliers (completely new vendors brought on specifically for the new spin-off entity).

Separated Suppliers: These suppliers already have existing relationships and processes with the parent company. Transitioning these suppliers typically involves transferring contracts and adjusting them to reflect the terms specific to the spin-off. Many requirements, such as initial due diligence and compliance checks, may already be satisfied, reducing onboarding time. However, additional considerations might include renegotiating pricing, revising delivery commitments, and redefining service level agreements (SLAs) tailored to the new entity’s scale and scope.

Net New Suppliers: Onboarding new suppliers from scratch often requires a more comprehensive process, including initial vetting, compliance checks, insurance validation, and establishing baseline performance metrics. These suppliers must be introduced to the spin-off’s specific operational needs, potentially necessitating expedited onboarding to meet tight timelines.

The onboarding of net new suppliers also often involves educating them on the spin-off’s unique business requirements and integrating them with the new entity’s systems. This can be more challenging in a spin-off transition, where resources and time are often limited.

Workarounds During Transition: Balancing Speed and Compliance

In the urgency of a spin-off transition, companies may need to implement certain workarounds to expedite supplier onboarding while still upholding essential standards. Examples include:

Temporary Waivers for Certain Certifications: While standard practice mandates full certification verification, spin-offs may grant temporary waivers for certifications not immediately critical to operational continuity, with the understanding that suppliers obtain full certifications within a specified period.

Streamlined Due Diligence for Low-Risk Suppliers: Not all suppliers pose the same level of risk. During a spin-off, companies may prioritize full due diligence for high-risk suppliers (e.g., critical raw materials suppliers) while streamlining requirements for low-risk suppliers, reducing onboarding time while managing risks.

Flexible Performance Metrics: Spin-offs may temporarily adjust performance metrics to account for the transitional nature of the operations. For instance, delivery times or quality standards could be slightly relaxed, allowing suppliers to ramp up to full capacity as the spin-off stabilizes.

Interim Contractual Terms: Instead of fully renegotiating terms, companies may employ interim contracts to ensure suppliers are engaged immediately, with the intent to finalize comprehensive contracts once the spin-off is more established.

Importance of Technology in Tracking Supplier Onboarding

Technology plays a vital role in managing the complexity of supplier onboarding in spin-offs, as it ensures that all activities are monitored and documented. Effective tracking helps manage multiple onboarding streams, especially when handling a blend of separated and new suppliers. Here are some ways technology assists in this context:

1. Centralized Onboarding Platforms: These platforms consolidate supplier data, streamline onboarding workflows, and provide transparency on the status of each supplier. They allow companies to manage registration, compliance checks, and risk assessments in one system, ensuring no step is overlooked.

2. Automated Due Diligence and Compliance Checks: Automated tools can expedite background checks and compliance verifications, reducing manual tasks and enhancing accuracy. This can be particularly valuable for spin-offs with tight deadlines and limited resources.

3. Performance and KPI Monitoring: Technology enables real-time monitoring of supplier performance against transitional KPIs, allowing spin-offs to make adjustments as needed. Digital tracking also helps capture metrics that may evolve post-transition, ensuring that supplier relationships adapt to long-term needs.

4. Document Management and Contract Tracking: Onboarding involves extensive documentation, from contracts to certifications. A digital document management system ensures that all critical documents are stored securely and accessible, allowing easy verification of compliance and facilitating contract renegotiations when needed.

5. Enhanced Communication and Collaboration: Supplier portals and digital communication tools can improve collaboration between the new entity and its suppliers, making it easier to provide updates, share requirements, and address issues promptly during the transition.

Conclusion

Supplier onboarding in a spin-off transition requires a tailored approach, balancing the need for quick integration with the requirement to maintain compliance and quality standards. By differentiating between separated and net new suppliers, companies can optimize onboarding processes and make the transition smoother. Leveraging technology is essential, as it enables companies to track activities, monitor compliance, and manage documentation, ensuring a structured and efficient onboarding process that supports the spin-off’s strategic goals.

About In2edge: In2edge is a certified woman-owned business specializing in strategic contract management, procurement transitions, and post-M&A integration services. Our tailored solutions help companies navigate complex business transitions, optimize contract management, and ensure operational readiness.

Beyond Boundaries: Navigating the Complex World of Cross-Border M&A

The world of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) becomes significantly more complex when transactions cross international borders. On the latest podcast episode of “M&A+ The Art After the Deal,” I had the pleasure of speaking with Lawrence Howorth, an experienced global strategist, about the complexities of cross-border M&A and how companies can successfully venture into foreign markets. With his extensive background in helping U.S. companies expand internationally and assisting foreign entities in establishing a presence in the U.S., Lawrence offered invaluable insights that are crucial for businesses looking to thrive in the global marketplace.

Global Expertise: A Key to Success in Cross-Border M&A

Lawrence Howorth has accumulated a wealth of experience across a diverse range of international markets. This deep understanding of various business environments is essential for any company looking to expand its operations overseas. As Lawrence explained, navigating cross-border M&A requires more than just financial acumen; it demands a nuanced grasp of cultural, operational, and regulatory aspects unique to each market.

For instance, cultural differences in how businesses operate, communicate, and make decisions can have a significant impact on the success of an acquisition. Lawrence highlighted the importance of fostering cultural integration, both at the organizational and personal levels, to ensure smoother transitions during post-deal integration.

Operationally, international markets present their own challenges, from supply chain logistics to human resource management. Companies must understand the local business customs, workforce expectations, and operational norms to avoid costly missteps. Additionally, regulatory frameworks vary widely, and staying compliant requires meticulous attention to detail.

Strategic Planning: Aligning M&A with Business Goals

One of the critical takeaways from our discussion was the importance of strategic planning. Lawrence emphasized that a cross-border acquisition must align with the company’s broader business goals. Expanding into a foreign market is not just about adding assets; it’s about ensuring that the acquisition supports the company’s long-term vision.

Without a clear strategic plan, companies can find themselves spread too thin or pursuing deals that don’t offer a competitive advantage. Lawrence stressed the need for comprehensive due diligence, not only to evaluate the financials but also to understand how the acquisition fits into the company’s overall growth strategy.

Moreover, this planning should extend beyond the transaction itself. It’s essential to think about the post-acquisition phase—how the new business will be integrated, how local teams will be managed, and how to align operations across different regions.

Understanding Local Dynamics: Avoiding Regulatory Pitfalls

Perhaps one of the most underestimated challenges of cross-border M&A is the local regulatory landscape. Lawrence pointed out that companies often overlook critical aspects of local regulations, leaving themselves vulnerable to legal and financial setbacks. Foreign markets come with unique sets of rules, from labor laws to tax requirements, environmental standards, and industry-specific regulations.

Lawrence shared a number of examples where U.S. companies entering foreign markets were blindsided by local requirements that significantly delayed or derailed their M&A efforts. To mitigate these risks, he advised engaging local experts early in the process to gain deep insights into regulatory frameworks. Such expertise can help companies anticipate challenges and adapt their strategies accordingly.

Additionally, Lawrence discussed the importance of understanding the political environment, which can directly affect business operations, especially in emerging markets. Having a solid grasp of the local political climate helps companies navigate changes that may impact regulations, trade, and market dynamics.

Comprehensive Business Planning: No Detail Overlooked

As with any complex business endeavor, comprehensive business planning is a non-negotiable aspect of cross-border M&A. Lawrence highlighted the need for a robust, well-rounded plan that covers every aspect of the deal—from due diligence and legal considerations to operations, marketing, and post-acquisition integration.

One of the key pieces of advice Lawrence shared was the importance of incorporating local considerations into broader business strategies. Many companies fail to adapt their global business models to the unique needs and behaviors of local markets, leading to friction and potential failure. By tailoring strategies to local conditions—whether it’s modifying product offerings, adjusting marketing campaigns, or customizing management approaches—companies can ensure their international ventures are positioned for success.

Building a Partnership Approach

Throughout the episode, one theme consistently emerged: the need for a partnership approach in cross-border M&A. Lawrence’s experience demonstrates the value of working collaboratively with local stakeholders, from legal experts and government officials to potential business partners and employees. Developing these partnerships helps companies build trust, which is essential for long-term success in foreign markets.

Furthermore, the episode underscored the importance of a dedicated, high-quality service provider in executing cross-border M&A deals. As a certified woman-owned business, In2edge has a proven track record of delivering exceptional project managed transition contract management services while fostering meaningful partnerships with its clients. This project-driven mindset is essential when navigating the challenges of international expansion.

Closing Thoughts: The Complexity of Cross-Border M&A

Cross-border M&A is not for the faint of heart, but with the right expertise and careful planning, it can unlock significant growth opportunities for companies. Lawrence Howorth’s insights serve as a roadmap for navigating the complex terrain of international mergers and acquisitions. Whether you’re a business seeking to expand into a foreign market or a professional involved in M&A, Lawrence’s guidance provides the critical tools necessary for success.

As we concluded our conversation, it became clear that cross-border M&A requires a commitment to understanding local markets, building strong partnerships, and integrating acquisitions into broader business goals. With these principles in mind, companies can thrive beyond their domestic boundaries and achieve sustainable growth in the global arena.

For more expert insights on mergers and acquisitions, particularly in the context of transition and post-close integration, don’t forget to subscribe to “M&A+ The Art After the Deal.” Join us next time as we continue exploring the art and science of M&A with top experts in the field.

To learn more about Lawrence Howorth and his global expertise, visit his website at Howorth International.

Click here to enjoy the informative interview with Lawrence Howorth on “M&A+ The Art After the Deal” podcast.

How Six Sigma Methods Can Streamline Contract Transitions in Spin-Off Acquisitions

In the dynamic world of mergers, acquisitions, and spin-offs, contract transitions often represent a complex and critical component of the process. When a company is being spun off, it involves not only separating and redistributing resources but also ensuring that all contractual obligations—vendor agreements, customer contracts, and internal service contracts—are smoothly transferred. One powerful methodology that can help streamline this process is Six Sigma.

Six Sigma, a data-driven approach aimed at process improvement and defect reduction, can be applied effectively to contract transition processes during a spin-off acquisition. Here’s how Six Sigma principles can mitigate risks, improve efficiency, and create a more seamless transition.

1. Defining Contractual Objectives

At the heart of Six Sigma lies the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) methodology. The first step, Define, is critical for aligning stakeholders on the contractual objectives during the spin-off process. Contracts often involve intricate terms and conditions tied to service levels, deliverables, or pricing models. A clear definition of key goals, including which contracts are prioritized and what success looks like for a smooth transition, is essential.

By defining the process and expectations, Six Sigma helps ensure that the team responsible for the contract transition has a unified vision and a roadmap that accounts for various stakeholder needs, from legal teams to procurement and operations.

2. Measuring Existing Contract Performance

The next step in the DMAIC framework is Measure. For contracts, this means gathering data on the current performance of each contract, including service levels, compliance metrics, and financial obligations. This analysis enables teams to determine which contracts are performing well and which might present challenges during the spin-off.

Six Sigma tools like Control Charts and Capability Analysis can be employed to measure the variability in contract performance. By doing so, potential risks can be identified, such as service delays, non-compliance issues, or excessive costs. These insights help determine where focused improvements can have the greatest impact during the transition.

3. Analyzing the Risks and Opportunities

The Analyze phase focuses on identifying root causes of any inefficiencies or defects within the existing contracts. During a spin-off, common challenges might include unclear terms regarding contract termination, lack of alignment between vendors and the new entity, or missing change-of-control provisions. These risks need to be addressed to prevent disruptions post-spin-off.

Using Six Sigma techniques like Cause-and-Effect Diagrams (also known as Fishbone Diagrams), teams can visualize the potential risks associated with each contract transition. This analysis allows organizations to be proactive, identifying contracts that may require renegotiation, early termination, or realignment before they affect the success of the newly spun-off company.

4. Improving Processes with Clear Action Plans

The Improve phase of Six Sigma is where optimization occurs. With a clear understanding of which contracts are at risk and why, teams can develop action plans to mitigate these risks. Process improvements could include creating standardized templates for contract transitions, establishing clear communication channels with vendors, or simplifying legal reviews by categorizing contracts based on risk levels.

Additionally, Lean principles—often integrated with Six Sigma—can be leveraged to eliminate waste in the contract transition process. This could involve automating repetitive tasks, like document retrieval or status reporting, to increase efficiency and reduce manual errors.

5. Controlling the Transition Process

Finally, the Control phase is where the improvements are monitored and maintained. In the context of contract transitions, this might involve establishing new governance frameworks for ongoing contract management, assigning contract owners, and using dashboards to track progress in real-time.

One key tool in Six Sigma for ensuring long-term success is the Control Plan. This plan ensures that the process improvements made during the spin-off transition continue to deliver value over time, preventing the reintroduction of inefficiencies or risks that could disrupt the new organization.

Six Sigma’s Broader Impact on Spin-Off Acquisitions

Applying Six Sigma methods to contract transitions during a spin-off acquisition doesn’t just ensure smooth operations in the short term—it also helps build a foundation for the future. As contracts are optimized and inefficiencies are reduced, the newly independent entity can focus on growth and innovation rather than firefighting operational issues.

Moreover, by standardizing the contract transition process, companies can replicate these improvements in future transactions, further enhancing their strategic agility in mergers and acquisitions.

Conclusion

In the high-stakes world of spin-off acquisitions, contract transitions can make or break the success of the newly formed entity. Six Sigma provides a structured, data-driven approach to managing this critical process. By defining clear objectives, measuring current performance, analyzing risks, improving processes, and maintaining control, Six Sigma helps ensure that contract transitions are smooth, efficient, and aligned with the broader goals of the business. For organizations undergoing a spin-off, integrating Six Sigma into the transition strategy can provide a significant competitive edge, reducing risks and setting the stage for future success.

At In2edge, we specialize in guiding businesses through the complexities of spin-offs and carve-outs, offering hands-on, expert-driven solutions to ensure seamless transitions. Our approach focuses on executing efficient, data-backed strategies—whether it’s optimizing contract management, ensuring operational continuity, or maximizing value creation. With our deep expertise and commitment to delivering exceptional outcomes, In2edge is your partner for navigating the intricate challenges of spin-offs and carve-outs, setting your business up for long-term success.

Navigating Chaos and Order in Contract Transitions – a Skit

Setting: Two separate conference rooms, one buzzing with chaos and the other humming with efficient processes during a high-volume procurement contract transition post-acquisition.

Characters:

Alex: Project Manager in the chaotic scenario.

Jordan: Contracts Administrator in the chaotic scenario.

Chris: Legal Counsel in the chaotic scenario.

Taylor: Project Manager in the smooth process scenario.

Morgan: Contracts Administrator in the smooth process scenario.

Jamie: Legal Counsel in the smooth process scenario.


Scene 1: Chaotic Conference Room

Alex: (Looking stressed) “Does anyone know the current status of the contracts with Supplier X? We need to move fast!”

Jordan: (Frantically searching through emails) “I thought Chris was handling that, but I can’t find the documents anywhere. Also, which legal entity are we using for this?”

Chris: (Overhearing) “Wait, I was waiting for Morgan to finalize the entity details. Or was it Taylor? This is confusing.”

Jordan: “And which version of the contract are we sending out? The last one I saw didn’t have any of the amendments we discussed.”

Alex: “This is a mess. We’re wasting so much time figuring out who does what and not actually doing anything.”


Scene 2: Efficient Conference Room

Taylor: (Calmly discussing with the team) “Alright, the transition plan is on track. Morgan, can you confirm that the contracts with Supplier X are ready for review?”

Morgan: “Yes, they’ve been prepared under the correct legal entity, as per the predefined process. Jamie reviewed the final amendments yesterday.”

Jamie: “Correct, I’ve ensured all legal requirements are met and the documents are compliant with our new strategy. They’re ready to be sent out.”

Taylor: “Great! Thanks for keeping everything on schedule. Let’s proceed with the next set on the list.”


Scene 3: Reflective Comparison

Alex: (Dialing into a video call with Taylor) “Taylor, how do you manage to keep your process so streamlined?”

Taylor: “It’s all about having a clear plan from the start, Alex. We use a centralized system where everyone accesses the same information. Each team member knows their responsibilities clearly.”

Alex: “That sounds efficient. We’re always tripping over who’s doing what, leading to delays and frustration.”

Taylor: “Maybe it’s time to implement a more structured approach on your end. Setting clear roles and using a unified platform can save a lot of time and reduce errors.”

Alex: “I agree. We need to overhaul our process. Perhaps we could set up a session for you to share your workflow with my team?”

Taylor: “I’d be happy to help, Alex. Let’s schedule it for next week.”


A Note about in2edge

In the world of contract transitions, particularly during mergers and acquisitions, the structured and efficient scenario is not just preferable but essential to reduce risk and capture value opportunities. In2Edge specializes in transforming the chaotic narrative into a seamless, well-organized process. Their teams are equipped with a deep understanding of legal intricacies and project management, ensuring that each phase of an M&A contract transition is handled in the most optimized way. By integrating In2Edge’s strategic frameworks and tools, companies can anticipate a smoother transition, reducing the risk of costly errors and delays. In2Edge makes this complexity manageable. Visit Intuitive Edge here.

The T-Shaped Lawyer: Essential for M&A Contract Transitions

I recently interviewed Peter Connor, the author of “The T Shaped Lawyer”. The concept of the T-shaped lawyer is revolutionizing the way the legal industry approaches and serves its business clients, whether it be in-house counsel or law firm lawyers. This model of professional development emphasizes not only deep legal expertise (the vertical bar of the ‘T’) but also a broad set of skills across various disciplines (the horizontal bar of the ‘T’). In my world, such lawyers are vital in the M&A process, specifically during transitions and integrations, where understanding a wide array of business, strategic, and interpersonal dynamics can significantly influence the outcome of a deal.

What is a T-Shaped Lawyer?

A T-shaped lawyer possesses deep legal knowledge in one or more areas of law, complemented by a wide array of other capabilities like project management, technology, business finance, and interpersonal skills. These broad skills enable them to communicate effectively across departments, understand business implications of legal decisions, and contribute to strategic planning and execution, making them particularly valuable in M&A contexts.

The Role of T-Shaped Lawyers in M&A Contract Transition

During M&A contract transitions, for example, T-shaped lawyers play a critical role. They don’t just focus on the legalities but also engage with various business units to ensure seamless integration of processes and cultures. Their broad skill set allows them to:

Facilitate Communication: They bridge the gap between legal jargon and business strategy, ensuring all stakeholders are on the same page.

Manage Projects: Their project management skills help streamline the transition process, keeping timelines on track and managing resources efficiently.

Drive Innovation: With a knack for technology and innovation, they can implement advanced tools for contract management, improving accuracy and speed.

Enhance Decision-Making: By understanding business implications, T-shaped lawyers ensure that decisions made during the transition phase support long-term strategic goals.

Hiring a T-Shaped Lawyer

When hiring a T-shaped lawyer for M&A activities, look for:

Broad Business Acumen: Candidates should understand basic business and operations principles.

Technology Proficiency: Proficiency in using modern legal or other tech tools that facilitate contract management and data analysis.

Interpersonal Skills: Strong communication and negotiation skills are crucial.

Experience in Multidisciplinary Roles: Look for experience outside traditional legal roles, such as in contract management, project management or business development.

Becoming a T-Shaped Lawyer

For lawyers aspiring to become T-shaped, Peter Connor’s guide suggests:

Continuous Learning: Engage in learning across various fields related to business, technology, and your areas of legal expertise.

Cross-functional Experience: Seek opportunities to work in cross-departmental teams or projects.

Develop Soft Skills: Enhance your interpersonal, negotiation, and leadership skills.

Utilize Mentorship: Learn from mentors who exemplify the T-shaped model, gaining insights into how they integrate their broad skills into their legal practice.

Conclusion

The evolution of the T-shaped lawyer reflects the changing landscape of the legal profession, particularly in the context of M&A transactions. By embodying this model, lawyers can significantly enhance the value they bring to firms and clients, ensuring that M&A transitions are not only legally sound but also strategically advantageous. As the demand for such multifaceted professionals grows, the legal industry must adapt, fostering a new generation of lawyers who are as comfortable in the boardroom as they are in the courtroom.

How to Learn More

To dive deeper into the concept of the T-shaped lawyer and explore practical steps for legal professionals, consider exploring Peter Connor’s works or attending one of his workshops. His insights can provide valuable guidance for both current and aspiring T-shaped lawyers.

Find Peter’s book on Amazon, click here.

View my interview with Peter Connor here.